Back

Model-Dependent Renal Phenotypes in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Comparative Histopathological Characterization of Commonly Used Animal Models

Rezaei, R.; Naimi, A.; Gheisari, Y.; Ramazani, Z.; S. Al-Amri, I.; Doustmohammadi, H.; Jamshidi-adegani, F.; Al-Hashmi, S.

2026-07-08 pathology
10.64898/2026.07.02.736132 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains a leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide, characterized by progressive structural and metabolic alterations secondary to chronic hyperglycemia. While numerous type 1 and type 2 rodent models have been developed to study the pathophysiology of DKD, no single model perfectly recapitulates the full clinical spectrum of human disease. The selection of an optimal model depends deeply on the specific research objective, as phenotypic expression and histopathological severity vary significantly across different strains and induction methods. The present study provides a comparative analysis of the renal histological of three widely utilized murine models: the chemically induced streptozotocin (STZ) model and the genetic Akita (type 1) and db/db (type 2) models. Methods: Male STZ-induced (28 weeks post-induction), heterozygous Akita (28 weeks old), and db/db mice at two different age intervals (18-21 and 16-24 weeks old) were assessed. Renal injury was quantified using four light-microscopic parameters: glomerulomegaly, mesangial hypercellularity, tubular vacuolization and arteriolar hyalinosis. Due to observed discrepancies between metabolic and structural findings in the db/db strain, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed for subcellular characterization. Results: All models exhibited significant hyperglycemia and albuminuria. At the light-microscopic level, STZ and Akita mice demonstrated consistent and pronounced renal lesions. In contrast, db/db mice despite increasing albuminuria and obesity, light microscopy revealed heterogeneous and inconsistent histopathological changes. However, TEM analysis of db/db mice kidneys successfully captured early ultrastructural injury, including irregular glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickening and focal podocyte foot process effacement, which were undetectable by light microscopy. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the Akita and STZ-induced models exhibit prominent structural alterations detectable by conventional light microscopy, whereas the db/db model requires ultrastructural evaluation by TEM to reliably confirm renal injury. This study underscores the limitation of routine histology in certain type 2 diabetes models and highlights the complementary value of TEM for accurate histopathological characterization. Collectively, the alternative histopathological markers identified herein offer sensitive and readily accessible indices for monitoring early-to-moderate DKD progression, providing a more robust framework for preclinical model selection and therapeutic evaluation in future studies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
37.5%
2
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Kidney International
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
7
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Kidney International Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
13
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
BMC Nephrology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
16
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.5%