Back

Location dependence of protein intrinsic disorder in Drosophila melanogaster

Abdulla Daanaa, H. S.; Kuraku, S.; Akashi, H.; Saito, K.

2026-07-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.02.732782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The relevance of protein structural flexibility in function remains contested, but experimental and computational evidence continues to accumulate. Many efforts to address this investigate intrinsic disorder, which commonly refers to peptide segments or entire protein sequences that presumably lack structure and exhibit high flexibility/conformational heterogeneity under physiological conditions. These efforts face challenges such as conflicting computational predictions and ambiguous relationships among intrinsic disorder locations and other protein properties. We address these challenges at a genome-wide scale in Drosophila melanogaster using residue-level predictions for various protein properties. We employ single and consensus approaches to quantify the prevalence of intrinsic disorder and attempt to infer function by testing for differences along protein sequences. Intrinsic disorder is likely more common at terminals than internal regions, and amino acid frequencies can vary substantially between regions in a manner that plausibly reflects functions of intrinsic disorder, rather than only proteome-wide effects. Tertiary structure potentially underlies the prevalence of intrinsic disorder along protein sequences; this prevalence varies more in a putatively solvent-exposed context than a solvent-buried one. Protein-binding appears to be a main function of intrinsic disorder, and we find support consistent with the notion that structural flexibility fosters binding plasticity, and show that location and protein length are factors in this relationship. Nucleic acid-binding and linker are ostensibly less common disorder functions than protein-binding, but nucleic acid-binding seems more localized at terminals. Residue-level estimates of selection pressure indicate that disordered regions generally evolve under weaker sequence constraints than structured regions, except at the N-terminal region. Biases in disorder prediction are a considerable factor in many of the observations, but unlikely a full explanation. The findings strengthen support for functional relevance of flexibility, offer insight into protein architecture and function, and lend impetus for experimental inquiry.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.2%
3
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.1%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
11
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
21
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
25
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%