Back

Romosozumab Safely Restores Bone Mass in Multiple Myeloma via Osteoblast Reprogramming: A Phase IIa Study

Gration, B.; Chai, R. C.; Young, S. G.; Sergio, C. M.; Skorokhodova, E.; Smith, J. T.; Castro-Martinez, A.; Bray, A.; Lin, X.; Yan, C.; Kao, J.; Perram, J.; Lai, S.; Lau, L.; Weilbaecher, K. N.; Moore, J.; Pocock, N.; Chaffer, C. L.; Center, J.; Phan, T. G.; McCaughan, G.; Croucher, P. I.

2026-07-06 hematology
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357196 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple myeloma causes devastating osteolytic bone disease. Current antiresorptive therapies slow bone loss but fail to rebuild the skeleton. Consequently, patients continue to fracture and suffer the associated morbidity and mortality. Targeting the Wnt inhibitor sclerostin, with romosozumab, increases bone mass in osteoporosis but has not been leveraged in cancer. We hypothesised that romosozumab would safely restore bone mass in multiple myeloma. In a murine model of myeloma, romosozumab was safe, demonstrating no impact on tumour progression while significantly increasing bone density. We subsequently conducted a Phase IIa proof-of-concept study in 12 multiple myeloma patients refractory to bisphosphonate therapy. Romosozumab was safe, it was well-tolerated and did not promote clinical or clonal myeloma progression. Treatment induced an early, significant rise in serum bone formation markers whilst resorption remained unchanged. This was coupled with significant gains in bone mineral density throughout the skeleton. Additionally, we observed radiological evidence of repair to pre-existing osteolytic lesions and, critically, a reduction in the skeletal morbidity rate from 2.5 to 0.11 events per patient-year. Longitudinal single-cell transcriptomics revealed that romosozumab transiently reprograms the osteoblast lineage to upregulate matrix synthesis and mineralisation programmes. These findings demonstrate that sclerostin inhibition safely rebuilds bone, providing clinical and mechanistic rationale for further randomised studies to restore bone health in myeloma patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
15.3%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.8%
3
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
5
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
9
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
10
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
12
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
13
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
20
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
27
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%