Back

Bench-stepping training improves stair-walking dynamics in older women: evidence from an exploratory nonlinear kinematic analysis

Baggen, R. J.; van Schooten, K. S.; Van Roie, E.; Verschueren, S. M.; Delecluse, C.; Delbaere, K.; Lord, S. R.; van Dieen, J. H.

2026-07-07 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357116 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Stair walking challenges balance and coordination in older people. Bench-stepping training improves stair climbing speed in healthy older women. This study assessed whether bench-stepping also improves dynamic balance and movement complexity during stair walking. Methods: Stair walking data were obtained from a previous study involving 45 healthy older women (69y+/-4) that assessed the effects of a 12-week bench-stepping intervention with non-training controls. Centre-of-mass acceleration was measured during stair ascent and descent. Linear dynamics included time, acceleration magnitude, and harmonic ratios (HR; indicating symmetry). Movement complexity was quantified using nonlinear dynamics including sample entropy (SE), recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), and fractal dimension (FD). Results: For stair ascent, increased speed (p =0.018, R2partial =0.093,) was accompanied by proportional increases in acceleration magnitudes (p=<0.039, R2partial =0.078-0.101). SE decreased more in the intervention group (p=<0.012, R2partial =0.049-0.101), indicating more predictable dynamics. In contrast, for stair descent, no changes in speed or acceleration magnitudes were observed. However, SE (p =0.001, R2partial =0.082) and maximum RQA line length (p= 0.008, R2partial =0.057) of vertical acceleration increased significantly compared to controls, indicating lower predictability and more persistent recurring patterns. No significant changes were found for other outcomes. Exploratory factor analysis revealed distinct differences in motor behaviour between stair ascent and descent. Conclusion: Bench-stepping training induced measurable changes in stair walking dynamics. Specifically, sample entropy shows potential as a sensitive marker of altered motor complexity, particularly of vertical accelerations. Interestingly, the direction of changes in unpredictability differed between stair ascent and descent, suggesting different underlying control strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
3
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
7
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
13
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Aging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
25
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%