Back

Combined triglyceride-glucose and frailty index (TyGFI) and risk of endometrial cancer in U.S. women aged >=45: NHANES 2011-2018 analysis integrating data engineering and machine learning with logistic modeling

Zhou, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.

2026-07-04 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357105 medRxiv
Show abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence is closely linked to metabolic and hormonal factors. The TyGFI, a composite indicator integrating the triglyceride-glucose index and frailty index, may capture combined risk dimensions relevant to EC etiology and prediction. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TyGFI and EC prevalence among U.S. women aged 45 years and older, and to explore its predictive utility using machine-learning approaches. Data were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2018 cycles. The exposure was TyGFI, and the outcome was EC status ascertained from self-reported cancer history and standardized questionnaires. From an initial 39,156 participants, we excluded males, individuals aged under 45 years, those missing TyGFI components or EC data, and extreme TyGFI values, yielding a final cohort of 2,837 women. We performed exploratory feature selection and built six predictive models using machine-learning algorithms to identify key predictors and evaluate TyGFI's contribution to model performance. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between TyGFI and EC prevalence with sequential adjustment for covariates. In a weighted sample representing 30,489,082 U.S. women aged 45 years and older, higher TyGFI was significantly associated with EC prevalence. After full adjustment, each unit increase in TyGFI corresponded to a 57% increase in the odds of EC (odds ratio 1.570; 95% confidence interval 1.033-2.370; p = 0.0322), with a significant dose-response trend across quartiles (p for trend = 0.0257). Among six machine-learning models, CatBoost achieved the highest predictive performance, with an area under the curve of 0.999. SHAP analysis identified TyGFI as the most influential predictor, followed by age and serum albumin. In this nationally representative sample of middle-aged and older U.S. women, TyGFI was significantly associated with EC prevalence and emerged as the dominant predictor in machine-learning models. These findings suggest that TyGFI may enhance risk stratification for EC beyond established reproductive and metabolic factors, though prospective studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
3
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
6
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%