Back

Predictors of carried ESBL-producing Enterobacterales involvement in ICU-acquired infection: insights from a bicentric retrospective cohort study.

Schimpf, C.; Soussan, R.; de Boissieu, P.; Quesnel, C.; Philippart, F.

2026-07-04 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357103 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale: Infections due to Extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) require empirical treatment with carbapenems. ESBL-PE carriage is considered as a risk factor for ESBL-PE involvement during ICU infection. Our aim was to determine factors that may predict the actual involvement of ESBL-PE. Methods: A two-periods bicentric ambispective study including ICU ESBL-PE carriers patients from April 2011 to January 2019. All ESBL-PE carriers who developed an infection were analyzed. Results: 6112 patients and 4902 patients were screened during the two periods. 384 and 232 ESBL-PE carriers were identified. Total number of infectious episodes were 146 and 114, respectively. A total of 144 pneumonias, 42 urinary tract infection and 45 digestive infections were studied. An ESBL-PE was involved in 35 (24.3%) episodes of pneumonia, and 44 (37.9%) of extra-pulmonary infections. The most frequent ESBL-PE involved were K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae and E. coli. Similar species and phenotypes were present in colonisation and infection in 29 (82.8%) of pneumonia and in 40 (90.9%) of extra-respiratory infection. Multivariate analysis identified Klebsiella pneumonia or Enterobacter cloacae carriage as risk factor for ESBL-PE involvement in pneumonia and E. coli carriage and detection of ESBL-PE carriage before ICU admission as protective factors. Conclusion: In our study an ESBL-PE involvement is infrequent in pneumonia. A known carriage before ICU admission and E. coli carriage are factors associated with the absence of ESBL-PE un the episode of respiratory infection. A confirmation of our findings could lead to a reduction in the empirical use of carbapenems in this population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
26.7%
2
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
4
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
7
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%