Back

Rapid odorant metabolism organizes identity- and timing-based odor representations by olfactory bulb inputs and outputs

Acquah, E. F.; Herrboldt, M. A.; Hallkaj, J.; Marie, M. A.; Wu, Z.; Chaloyard, J.; Andriot, I.; Heydel, J.-M.; zhao, K.; Matsunami, H.; Wachowiak, M.

2026-07-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.01.735924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sensory neurons encode information about external stimuli in the form of stimulus-specific patterns of activity across their population. In the mammalian olfactory system, olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) encode odor identity with odorant-specific combinatorial patterns that are temporally structured by inhalation. We investigated the stimulus features that determine these inhalation-linked patterns, leveraging receptor- and functionally-defined OSN populations in awake mice. We found that both the chemical tuning and temporal dynamics of many odorant-evoked responses deviate from prevailing models of receptor-ligand binding and sensitivity-based timing relationships. These deviations were well-explained by rapid metabolism of odorants within the olfactory mucosa, which generates secondary odorants that activate additional OSNs within a single breath. This process fundamentally reshapes odor representations at naturally-occurring concentrations and timescales relevant to perception. Importantly, we found that timing features robustly discriminate inhaled from metabolism-generated odorants, and that these timing differences persist at the level of olfactory bulb output. Our results suggest a novel role for inhalation-linked timing in odor coding - to disambiguate inhaled odorants from those generated internally - and raise the possibility that the nervous system may differentially process external and internally-sourced olfactory stimuli on the basis of their temporal dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.