Back

Genomic compartmentalization of pervasive sex-biased gene expression in the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus

Cantu, D.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.; Sisterson, M.; Minio, A.; Cochetel, N.; Naegele, R.; Burbank, L.

2026-07-07 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.01.735863 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, is a globally invasive pest of grapevine and a vector of leafroll viruses. Like other mealybugs, it reproduces through paternal genome elimination, a sex-determination system that operates without sex chromosomes and is associated with extreme sexual dimorphism. To characterize genome organization and sex-biased expression in this species, we generated a long-read reference genome spanning 369 Mb with 23,489 annotated genes and macrosynteny conserved with the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri. Resequencing of four California field individuals yielded a first whole-genome estimate of nucleotide diversity and 132 microsatellite markers for population monitoring. Among 2,129 candidate secreted proteins, a conserved core is shared with P. citri, but each species carries a distinct set of lineage-specific effectors. Comparing adult male and female transcriptomes, we found sex-biased expression to be pervasive and skewed toward females: 41% of tested genes differed between the sexes, with female-biased genes both more numerous and showing larger fold changes. These female-biased genes were not randomly distributed but concentrated in discrete blocks of coordinately expressed, tandemly duplicated gene families, a pattern not previously described in a mealybug. Male- and female-biased secreted proteins also differed in origin, with male-biased proteins drawn from a conserved repertoire shared with P. citri and female-biased proteins spanning a more lineage-specific pool. Together, these results reveal a female-skewed, spatially clustered architecture of sex-biased expression in a mealybug that lacks sex chromosomes, and provide genomic resources for managing an invasive vineyard pest.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.6%
2
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.1%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
5
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
14
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
16
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.6%
18
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
26
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%