Back

Determinants of Blood Group Antigen Expression and Prediction of Phenotypes by Machine Learning

Kranz, A.-C.; Schneider, J.; Gassner, C.; Bublitz, M.

2026-07-07 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.01.735824 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Blood group antigens, defined by epitopes on the erythrocyte surface, are central to transfusion safety and maternal-fetal compatibility. While the genetic basis of many clinically relevant blood group antigens is well established, which structural and biophysical parameters determine whether a single-nucleotide variant gives rise to an antigenic phenotype remains unclear. Here, we integrate structural, biophysical, and evolutionary analyses to systematically evaluate features associated with single amino acid substitutions across 24 human protein-based blood group systems. We analyse 319 variants with curated phenotypic annotations alongside 481 control variants, identifying key determinants of null and antigenic phenotypes. Null variants are characterized by high evolutionary conservation, burial within the protein core, loss of hydrophobicity, increased polarity, and a propensity for arginine substitutions. Antigenic variants are also enriched in arginine; however, in contrast to null variants, they tend to occur at less conserved, more solvent-accessible, and structurally flexible sites. Supervised machine learning models trained on structural and biophysical descriptors were applied to distinguish (i) null and (ii) antigenic variants from controls, achieving balanced accuracies of 0.82 and 0.63, respectively. Feature importance analysis identified predicted pathogenicity, solvent accessibility, and evolutionary conservation as the most predictive determinants of null variants, whereas hydrophobicity, conservation, and flexibility dominated antigen prediction. This work establishes a framework linking molecular variation to blood group phenotypes and provides a foundation for predicting the impact of novel missense mutations in transfusion medicine and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
2
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
4
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
7
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
19
Glycobiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
21
ImmunoInformatics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
25
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
27
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%