Back

Optimizing Light Traps for Littoral Mysids and Mesopredatory Fish in the Baltic Sea: Environmental Drivers and Seasonal Monitoring Efficacy

Ogonowski, M.

2026-07-02 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.01.735747 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Littoral mysids facilitate benthic-pelagic coupling through horizontal migration, yet quantitative monitoring in structurally complex habitats remains methodologically challenged where traditional active gears fail. We evaluated the efficacy of standardized light traps for monitoring littoral mysids (Neomysis integer, Praunus flexuosus) and mesopredatory three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in the northern Baltic proper, Baltic Sea. Using a paired experimental design with predator-exclusion and unmodified traps, alongside concurrent passive benthic trapping, we assessed abiotic drivers affecting catchability, biotic interactions, and statistical power to monitor changes in population size over time. Results indicated significant biotic interference: unmodified traps attracted high densities of sticklebacks, which reduced mysid catches by approximately 85% through predation or behavioural avoidance. Consequently, physical predator exclusion is mandatory for accurate mysid sampling. Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) confirmed that catch rates for all taxa were primarily driven by night duration rather than water temperature. While passive benthic trap catches tracked metabolic activity (peaking in warm summer months), light trap efficiency peaked in spring and collapsed during summer, confirming that sampling efficiency was strictly limited by the short duration of the night. Simulation-based power analysis revealed a stark contrast in monitoring utility based on spatial aggregation. For highly aggregated mysids, the method demonstrated low precision (Power < 0.25 to detect a 50% decline), rendering it suitable primarily for detecting substantial population collapses (>90%). In contrast, for less aggregated sticklebacks, the method achieved a more robust statistical power (>0.80 for a 60% decline), validating light traps as a precise tool for monitoring these abundant mesopredators. We conclude that light traps fill a critical methodological gap for winter and early spring monitoring when traditional passive gears underperform. Appropriate abundance indices should be based on statistical models accounting for night duration and strictly employ physical exclusion barriers when targeting mysids.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
21.4%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
3
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
6
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
18
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%