Back

Proliferative and Motile Cell Interplay in Glioma Invasion: Go-or-Grow Switching Caps the Invasion Speed

Sadhukhan, S.; Santra, D.

2026-07-07 biophysics
10.64898/2026.07.01.735477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffuse gliomas are deadly because the individual tumor cells invade - they travel far from the imageable mass, so it is impossible to remove the tumor completely. On the cellular level, glioma cells seem to be in either a "go" state (in which they do not divide) or a "grow" state (in which they do not migrate). We investigate what this tiny choice has to say about the large-scale speed of the invasion front and whether the implication is sufficiently strong to rule out the classical description of the Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovsky-Piskunov (Fisher-KPP) type, in which a single phenotype migrates and proliferates. We derive a two-phenotype reaction-diffusion model with density-dependent switching, and we prove the cooperative (quasi-monotone) structure and the associated comparison principle and study travelling-wave solutions of the model. A leading-edge linearization gives minimal front speed as minimizer of an explicit dispersion relation, and direct simulation verifies the predicted speed. In the experimentally relevant fast switching limit, we find a closed-form expression for the speed, that is, we obtain an effective Fisher-KPP equation with rescaled diffusivity and growth rate, with the fractions of the phenotypes. The "go-or-grow" (GoG) front can move at a maximum speed of half the Fisher speed for the same single-cell motility $D$ and proliferation rate $r$, which occurs only when the cells divide their time equally between the two phenotypes. This bound is directly testable: measurement of the front speed, plus independent determination of $D$ and $r$, discriminates the two hypotheses, and in the GoG case, yields recovery of the phenotype balance. We then extend the result to anisotropic (DTI-informed) invasion along white-matter tracts and discuss implications for understanding clinical measurements of growth rate.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.8%
2
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.7%
5
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
10
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
13
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
21
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
23
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%