Automated Multisource Electronic Frailty Index in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Development and Clinical Utility
Lin, S.; Foo, W. T.; Ng, Y. S.; Chang, H. M.; laura, T. B. G.; De Silva, D. A.
Show abstract
Background: Frailty is common in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and predicts poor outcomes, but is not routinely captured in acute stroke care. Manual frailty tools are difficult to apply consistently in busy inpatient settings, while existing electronic frailty indices (eFIs) often rely on limited data modalities. We developed a scalable pre-stroke electronic frailty index (eFI) using multisource electronic medical record (EMR) data and evaluated its clinical utility. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of AIS admissions to Singapore General Hospital from July 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. A fully automated pipeline derived an eFI from EMR data over a 3-year lookback period, incorporating ICD-10 codes, vital signs, anthropometry, laboratory results, medications, and free-text documentation processed using artificial intelligence?augmented extraction of predefined, clinically interpretable deficits. Candidate variables were screened using a validated 10-step frailty index framework and refined by multidisciplinary expert consensus. Results: Among 501 AIS cases, the pipeline generated 75 candidate variables and a final 33-variable eFI, with scores derived for 492 cases (98.2%). Frail patients had greater premorbid disability, higher stroke severity, longer hospitalization, greater rehabilitation use, worse discharge disability, higher 30-day readmission, and higher cumulative post-discharge mortality. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, premorbid mRS, and reperfusion therapy, each 0.1-unit increase in eFI was associated with mortality beyond 90 days after discharge (adjusted HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.19?1.81), 30-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.43?2.59), longer hospital stay (?, 2.8 days; 95% CI, 1.4?4.2), and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation rather than home (adjusted RRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27?2.16). Conclusions: In a well-documented acute stroke service supported by comprehensive longitudinal EMR data, automated multisource eFI derivation was feasible and clinically informative in AIS, capturing baseline vulnerability beyond conventional stroke measures and supporting frailty-informed risk stratification and discharge planning.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 96%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 96%
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 94%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 97%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 94%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 96%
- A Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke 95%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.