Back

The Effect of Marital Status on Suicide Risk Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Population-Based sIPTW Competing Risk Analysis

Zou, X.; Shi, J.

2026-07-04 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.01.26357044 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Breast cancer survivors often experience psychological distress that may increase suicide risk. Marital status, a proxy for social support, may influence this risk, but its role within a competing-risk framework is unclear. This study examined the association between marital status and suicide mortality and assessed modification by socioeconomic and geographic factors. Methods: This is a population-based cohort study using SEER data, including adults diagnosed with primary breast cancer from 2000 to 2022. Marital status was classified as married/partnered or unmarried/non-partnered. Baseline characteristics were balanced using subdistribution inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW). Suicide mortality was analyzed using sIPTW-weighted Fine-Gray competing-risk models, treating non-suicide deaths as competing events. Landmark, subgroup, interaction, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Among 825,047 patients, 40.7% were unmarried. Covariates were well balanced after weighting (SMD <0.01). During follow-up, 529 suicide deaths occurred. Unmarried status was associated with higher suicide mortality (sHR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.60). Male sex and estrogen receptor-negative tumors increased risk, while older age and non-White race were protective. Findings were consistent in Cox models (HR = 1.45) and sensitivity analyses (sHR = 1.42). Landmark analyses showed persistent associations at 1, 3, and 5 years. The association was attenuated in the highest income quartile but not modified by rural-urban status. Conclusions: Unmarried breast cancer patients had higher suicide mortality. These findings support integrating psychosocial assessment and targeted suicide prevention into survivorship care, especially for socially vulnerable groups.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
4
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
13
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%