Back

Double Burden of Malnutrition among Hospitalized Adults and Length of Hospital Stay in Hanoi, Vietnam: A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study

TRAN, A. Q.; MIYOSHI, F.; TOYAMA, K.; GOMI, I.; NAKAHARA, S.; SHONO, R.; NGUYEN, L. T.; NGUYEN, L. T. H.; LE, H. T.; NAKAMURA, T.

2026-07-02 nutrition
10.64898/2026.07.01.26356915 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) among hospitalized patients in Vietnam remains limited. This study examined nutritional status at admission and its association with length of hospital stay among adults in Hanoi. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in eight public hospitals in Hanoi between September 2018 and November 2019. Adults aged 18-60 years were assessed within 48 hours of admission using interviews, physical examination, anthropometric measurements, and medical records. Nutritional status was classified using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and body mass index (BMI): undernourished (SGA-B or SGA-C or BMI <18.5 kg/m2) and overnourished (SGA-A and BMI [&ge;]25.0 kg/m2). Length of stay was compared across nutritional-status groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Among 1,183 registered patients, 1,115 had sufficient data for analysis. Overall, 24% were undernourished and 16% overnourished. Weight loss during the preceding six months was reported by 54%, although most losses were <5%. SGA-B or SGA-C was identified in 20%, whereas 11% had BMI <18.5 kg/m2. The median hospital stay was 8 days, with no significant difference across nutritional status groups. Conclusions DBM was prevalent among hospitalized adults in Hanoi. Indicators of recent nutritional deterioration were more common than low BMI, suggesting that BMI alone may overlook early disease-related nutritional decline. Nutritional status was not associated with length of stay in this relatively young, predominantly mild-to-moderate patient population. Hospital nutritional screening should therefore assess recent nutritional changes across the full BMI spectrum.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
28.4%
2
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.1%
7
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%