Back

Integrating Causal Inference into Pharmacovigilance: Target Trial Emulations for Proactive Signal Detection of Atorvastatin Initiation in Medicare Beneficiaries

Rowan, C. G.; Tran, M.; Srivastava, S.

2026-07-10 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.01.26356874 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Adverse drug events in older adults are a substantial public health burden, yet spontaneous reporting systems detect them poorly owing to underreporting and the lack of a defined population. These limitations are of particular concern for older adults, who are underrepresented in pre-approval trials yet at elevated risk owing to polypharmacy, multimorbidity, and age-related changes in drug metabolism. Objective: To develop and apply an active, claims-based pharmacovigilance framework using sequential target trial emulation to detect adverse drug event signals in older adults, with atorvastatin as the initial application. Methods: Using Medicare fee-for-service claims (2017-2019), we studied statin-naive beneficiaries aged 65 years or older following myocardial or cerebral infarction. We emulated up to 14 daily sequential trials from the discharge date, classifying patients as initiating atorvastatin (A1), initiating a different medication (A2), or no new medication (A0); the primary contrast was A1 versus A2. For each trial, incident outcomes were ascertained and classified into 552 outcomes based on the Clinical Classifications Software Refined categories. Per-protocol effects were estimated over a 6-month follow-up period using Fine-Gray regression models weighted by the inverse probability of treatment and censoring, treating death as a competing risk, with the false discovery rate controlled via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. A signal was declared when the q-value was 0.10 or lower and the subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) was 1.20 or greater in any prespecified analytic stratum (sensitivity analyses used thresholds of q 0.20 or lower and sHR 1.20 or greater). Results: Of 70,130 eligible patients, 39,948 initiated atorvastatin (A1) and 19,182 initiated another new medication (A2); after weighting, baseline characteristics were closely balanced. After excluding outcomes with sparse cell counts, 295 outcomes were analyzed; five met the primary signal detection criteria: valve disorders (sHR 1.71, 1.20 to 2.43); sprains and strains (sHR 1.79, 1.26 to 2.54); general sensation/perception symptoms (sHR 1.23, 95 percent CI 1.11 to 1.36); abnormal findings without diagnosis (sHR 1.55, 1.18 to 2.05); and prediabetes (sHR 1.71, 1.24 to 2.36). In the sensitivity analysis, we additionally detected posthemorrhagic anemia, hemorrhagic stroke, varicose veins, and other circulatory and skin conditions. Conclusions: An active, claims-based framework using sequential target trial emulation detected both expected and previously unrecognized adverse drug event signals following atorvastatin initiation in older adults, offering a systematic alternative to passive surveillance that can be extended to other commonly prescribed medications.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
2
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
5
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
6
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
12
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
14
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
26
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%