A Single-cell Atlas of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma Reveals VEGF-Driven Angiogenic Remodeling as a Therapeutic Vulnerability
Martini-Stoica, H.; Rupp, B. T.; Kunz, M.; Livraghi-Butrico, A.; Okuda, K.; O'Neal, W.; Randell, S.; Dang, H.; Murano, H.; Furusho, M.; Morton, L.; Askin, F.; Thorp, B. D.; Klatt-Cromwell, C.; Ebert, C. S.; Senior, B. A.; Vuncannon, J. R.; Kimple, A. J.; Byrd, K. M.
Show abstract
Background: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) is a rare locally aggressive vascular sinonasal tumor that primarily affects adolescent males. Despite advances in endoscopic surgery and preoperative embolization, JNA can be associated with major operative bleeding risk and clinically meaningful recurrence, while non-surgical treatment options remain limited. Methods: To define the cellular programs underlying JNA vascularity, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing of JNA tumors (n=2), tumor-adjacent mucosa, and control sinonasal tissue. We analyzed cell composition, differential gene expression, pathway enrichment, and cell-cell communication, followed by Drug2cell-based mapping of transcriptional states to candidate therapeutic targets. Results: JNA contained an expanded fibrovascular compartment composed of endothelial cells, fibroblasts, pericytes, vascular smooth muscle cells, and neural crest-like cells. Neural crest-like cells were enriched in JNA but showed relatively limited transcriptional differences from tumor-adjacent tissue. By contrast, endothelial cells demonstrated the strongest disease-associated remodeling, with enrichment of angiogenesis, extracellular matrix organization, hypoxia response, and cell migration pathways. Endothelial cells also showed downregulation of adaptive immune signaling pathways, suggesting reduced immune engagement within the tumor microenvironment. Intercellular communication analyses revealed dense endothelial-stromal signaling across the JNA fibrovascular network. Drug2cell analysis nominated VEGF/VEGFR signaling as a candidate therapeutic vulnerability, with VEGFR-targeting agents predicted to act primarily on vascular and lymphatic endothelial populations. Conclusions: JNA is organized around an angiogenesis-dominant fibrovascular program driven by endothelial-centered signaling. These data support further investigation of VEGF/VEGFR-directed therapy as a potential adjunctive strategy for patients with recurrent, unresectable, or surgically high-risk JNA.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 93%
- Cellular-level phenotyping of tumor-immune microenvironment (TiME) in patients in vivo reveals distinct inflammation and endothelial anergy signatures 92%
- Integrative spatial omics reveals distinct tumor-promoting multicellular niches and immunosuppressive mechanisms in Black American and White American patients with TNBC 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kinome Profiling of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Using Multiplexed Inhibitor Beads and Mass Spectrometry Identifies Wee1 as Candidate Therapeutic Target 92%
- CD73 restrains mutant β-catenin oncogenic activity in endometrial carcinomas 91%
- An engineered glioblastoma model yields novel macrophage-secreted drivers of invasion 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A dual readout embryonic zebrafish xenograft model of rhabdomyosarcoma to assess clinically relevant multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors 92%
- Platinum chemotherapy induces lymphangiogenesis in cancerous and healthy tissues that can be prevented with adjuvant anti-VEGFR3 therapy 92%
- Integrated molecular and pharmacological characterization of patient-derived xenografts from bladder and ureteral cancers identifies new potential therapies. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.