Back

TCR-FramePose: a local-frame representation for decomposing global docking and CDR3 loop geometry in TCR-pMHC recognition

Kim, K. H.; Jiang, X.; Ye, Q.; Mohanty, V.; Dede, M.; Reuben, A.; Chen, K.

2026-07-04 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.30.735664 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cell receptor recognition of peptide-MHC depends on sequence, interface chemistry, and three-dimensional geometry, but docking geometry is often summarized at the whole-receptor level, leaving CDR3-local pose difficult to compare across structures. We introduce TCR-FramePose, a local-frame descriptor set that represents each TCR-pMHC complex as three bodies - whole TCR, CDR3a, and CDR3b - measured relative to a pMHC groove frame. For each body, FramePose decomposes the native pose into reach, offset direction on S^2, and orientation on SO(3); for tangent-space analyses, these components are mapped to six coordinates per body and 18 coordinates per complex. Applied to 378 curated abTCR-pMHC crystal structures, FramePose recovers known class-associated receptor-placement differences and additionally resolved whole-TCR and CDR3b orientation shifts that were not captured by crossing angle. The same orientation coordinates identified reverse-polarity and off-axis outliers as distinct modes. In cross-validated association analyses, FramePose added nonredundant BSA- and affinity-associated information beyond conventional descriptors, and the modest affinity gain was concentrated in CDR3 orientation blocks which were least recoverable from conventional descriptors. Biological grouping analyses showed that shared receptor pose over peptide-MHC was organized primarily by germline V-region framework. TCRs recognizing the same peptide-MHC target favors shared FramePose geometries rather than strong receptor-specific divergence, whereas CDR3 sequence did not detectably reposition the rigid-body pose after antigen context and germline framework were fixed. MHC allele and peptide length contributed smaller adjustments, localized mainly to CDR3b and groove-normal orientation axes. Finally, interface analyses showed that affinity tracked interface burial, with CDR3b reach linking FramePose geometry to binding through buried surface area. Within engineered panels, mutation-level effects were panel-specific, with CDR3b remodeling localizing to a recurrent interface region but varying in direction across receptors. These properties enable FramePose to serve as a geometric filter for in silico TCR-pMHC models and as a feature layer for structure-guided TCR engineering. Together, TCR-FramePose provides a nonredundant geometric layer for structure-guided TCR-pMHC analysis, linking germline-scaffolded recognition, CDR3-local pose, and interface organization without replacing sequence, contact, or energetic descriptors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.1%
2
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
5
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
9
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
12
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
16
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%