Back

Brain2voice 2.0: High-performance voice synthesis brain-computer interface

Wairagkar, M.; Srinivasan, A.; Card, N. S.; Singer-Clark, T.; Hou, X.; Iacobacci, C.; Miller, L. M.; Hochberg, L. R.; Brandman, D. M.; Stavisky, S. D.

2026-07-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.30.735633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a promising solution to speech loss due to neurological injury by decoding intended speech directly from brain activity. While recent BCIs have restored high-accuracy text-based communication, they fail to provide instantaneous voice output essential for the natural flow of conversation. Brain-to-voice BCIs address this gap by decoding voice directly from neural signals. However, even the state-of-the-art (SOTA) BCI-synthesized voice is not yet intelligible enough for real-world adoption. We introduce brain2voice 2.0, a new multimodal Transformer-based BCI decoder architecture capable of synthesizing highly intelligible voice from intracortical neural signals in real-time. Brain2voice 2.0 is trained on continuous and custom-tokenized acoustic targets and phoneme targets, leveraging their complementary speech information. We use self-supervised and adversarial training objectives that enhance acoustic feature quality and improve synthesis intelligibility. At each 10 ms timestep, the model causally outputs continuous and tokenized acoustic features for real-time voice synthesis as well as time-aligned phoneme predictions (raw phoneme error rate: 7%, comparable to the latest brain-to-text models). We evaluated this new approach on our prior intracortical brain-to-voice benchmark dataset (Wairagkar et al. 2025). Naive human listeners transcribed brain2voice 2.0 synthesized voice with a word error rate of 5.24%--an 8x improvement in intelligibility over previous SOTA results (43.75%). Brain2voice 2.0 demonstrates that highly intelligible real-time voice synthesis from neural signals is achievable, for the first time crossing the intelligibility threshold necessary for clinically viable brain-to-voice BCIs for people with paralysis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.7%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
5
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
9
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
11
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
17
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
19
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
22
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%