Back

XIBBIT: A biometric recognition tool for efficient Xenopus laevis identification and colony management

Tomanin, D.; Tonie, S.; Bunte, K.; Kamenz, J.

2026-07-09 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.06.30.735627 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The African clawed frog Xenopus laevis is a widely utilized model organism in biomedical research; however, significant challenges in experimental reproducibility and colony management remain. A major obstacle lies in the reliable identification of individual animals, since frogs are generally housed in large groups and are difficult to distinguish due to their high morphological similarity. Conventional methods, including toe clipping and microchipping, are invasive and cause distress, emphasizing the need for non-invasive methods for accurate documentation and welfare monitoring. In this study, we introduce XIBBIT (Xenopus Image-Based Biometric-pattern Identification Tool), a web-based application integrating computer vision and machine learning to identify individual Xenopus laevis based on their dorsal patterning. By exploiting these natural biometric signatures, the platform achieves reliable identification with up to 95.7% accuracy within three image captures under real life conditions. In addition to identification, XIBBIT provides a centralized colony management system. It archives individual data, including health records and experimental histories, with customizable fields. To demonstrate XIBBITs capabilities, we used the application to track egg quality across repeated egg-laying events, revealing that egg quality is a repeatable, individual-specific trait in Xenopus laevis. Furthermore, we find seasonal effects on egg laying performance with the lowest performance during late-spring and summer months. Ultimately, XIBBIT provides an effective, time-efficient, and non-invasive solution to the problem of individual Xenopus laevis identification, facilitating both experimental reproducibility and high animal welfare standards.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.8%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
11
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
13
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
17
Developmental Dynamics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%