Back

Increased perceived effort during contralateral thermal heat pain is not explained by increased intracortical and corticospinal inhibition.

Monti, I.; Bergevin, M.; Murugavel Sangeetha, M.; Thomas, M.; Neva, J.; Roy, M.; Rainville, P.; Pageaux, B.

2026-07-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.30.735616 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Pain influences motor function and has been proposed to reduce corticospinal and intracortical excitability. At the same time, performance can be maintained during pain, at the cost of increased perceived effort, a centrally generated signal reflecting resource engagement. Here, we tested whether contralateral thermal heat pain-related changes in corticospinal and intracortical excitability contribute to increased effort perception. Methods. In this preregistered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study, twenty-one healthy participants received single and paired pulse TMS at rest and during submaximal isometric right wrist flexions performed at 20% maximal peak force. Trials were conducted under a control condition or during contralateral thermal stimulation (painful or non-painful warm) applied to the left forearm. After each contraction, participants rated the intensity of their perceived effort. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability of the right wrist flexor was assessed at rest and during submaximal contractions. Results. Contralateral heat pain significantly increased perceived effort compared with the control and warm conditions. Contralateral heat pain did not reduce corticospinal or intracortical excitability. Conversely, contralateral heat pain increased corticospinal excitability, reflected primarily in decreased cortical silent period duration. Perceived effort was associated with the subjective experience of pain rather than with TMS-derived variables. Conclusions. These findings suggest that increased effort during contralateral heat pain cannot be attributed to inhibition of the primary motor cortex or the corticospinal pathway. The higher perceived effort in the presence of contralateral heat pain likely reflects the cognitive cost of pain rather than alterations in the transmission of the motor command.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Neurobiology of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
11
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
13
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
14
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
22
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%