Temporal Processing during Decision Making under Uncertainty.
Rabinovich, R.; Feldman, D. A.; Cowan, R. L.; Price, T. A.; Shahdoust, N. L.; Davis, T. S.; Rahimpour, S.; Shofty, B.; Smith, E. H.
Show abstract
Time perception and decision-making are interrelated processes that are critical to much of human and animal behavior. Although the behavioral importance of this link between the processes has been established, the neural underpinnings of temporal decision-making are unclear. The current study leverages human intracranial electrophysiology to investigate the neural contribution of temporal processing to decision-making under risk. To probe temporal decision-making, we use a version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, in which participants inflate virtual balloons with the goal of reaching maximal balloon size but stopping inflation before the balloon pops. Points are awarded based on inflation duration of successful trials, such that points awarded are linearly related to balloon size. By decoding temporal features of the task on a trial-by-trial basis, we find neural representations of time during balloon inflation. Specifically, we find that both medial and lateral temporal regions of the brain encode the majority of this time-related signal. Importantly, we can decode the progression of time leading up to the outcome of a successful decision (pressing a button to stop inflation before the balloon pops). This encoding of time depends on an active decision to end the trial: we cannot decode time during passive observation of balloon inflation to a known maximal size. To validate these results further, we use a temporal convolution network to predict participants' response (i.e., time of button press) based on the brain activity leading up to the response. We find that we can predict the moment of response with high accuracy and temporal resolution. The model predicts the timing of successful decisions but not the timing of balloon pops. Together, these findings reveal neural representations that encode the progression of time, specifically in relation to an active decision.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mesoscale cortex-wide neural dynamics predict goal-directed, but not random actions in mice several seconds prior to movement 96%
- Coding of latent variables in sensory, parietal, and frontal cortices during virtual closed-loop navigation 95%
- Deep learning based feature extraction for prediction and interpretation of sharp- wave ripples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.