Back

Penumbria: Advanced 3D cell segmentation for biomedical imaging

Stockert, L.; Donovan, J.; Baier, H.

2026-07-01 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.30.735527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional cellular architecture is fundamental to understanding tissue organization, disease progression, and drug response. Yet 3D cell segmentation remains a critical bottleneck due to diverse cell morphologies, low signal-to-noise ratios, and data scarcity. We introduce Penumbria, a general-purpose 3D cell segmentation framework that achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across morphologically distinct cell populations and imaging conditions in volumetric microscopy. Penumbria formulates segmentation as a regression problem on distances to cell boundaries, supporting instance reconstruction without shape priors and permitting end-to-end GPU inference. A U-Net-based architecture with xLSTM bottleneck blocks and patch embeddings enables multi-scale feature extraction, long-range modeling of spatial context, and convolutional feature-volume tokenization. The model is extended with two modules: a Global Zernike Phase Layer, which learns Zernike-parameterized phase corrections in the frequency domain to undo optical aberrations such as defocus and tilt, and a Scaled Geocaps Layer, which samples features at fixed grid locations across multiple spatial scales, routing evidence between them such that a detection is only confident where concordance holds across scales simultaneously. Across four diverse 3D datasets selected to probe the limits of existing methods, Penumbria outperforms Cellpose-SAM across all evaluation thresholds and surpasses StarDist-3D on most datasets while matching it on Parhyale hawaiensis. Trained entirely from scratch, Penumbria achieves up to a 38% improvement in mean average precision over the second-best method. Strong boundary accuracy further supports downstream analyses such as quantifying membrane dynamics or protein localization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.8%
3
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
5
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
7
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%