Back

Small scale habitat components as key drivers of biodiversity in urban park design

Trigos-Peral, G.; Reyes Lopez, J. L.

2026-07-01 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.30.735471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urban green spaces are increasingly recognised as important refuges for biodiversity, yet their ecological value depends strongly on design and management. Here, we investigate how fine-scale structural and microhabitat components shape urban ant assemblages, using ants as indicators of broader arthropod responses to urbanisation. Ant communities were sampled in twelve urban green spaces in Cordoba (southern Spain) over a ten-year period (2004 to 2013) using pitfall traps, alongside detailed characterisation of vegetation structure and ground-layer microhabitats. In total, 38 species and 25,578 individuals were recorded. Microhabitat variables explained 58% of the variation in species occurrence. Community differences among microhabitats were driven primarily by nestedness, with dense herbaceous cover acting as a core habitat and edge-related components contributing disproportionately to beta diversity. Tree abundance showed a unimodal relationship with species richness, with maximum diversity at intermediate densities, while shrub and lawn cover had weak or inconsistent effects. Fine-scale elements such as leaf litter, stones, woody debris, and small bare-ground patches strongly influenced species occurrence by providing thermal refugia, nesting substrates, and foraging opportunities. The invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) exhibited strong but spatially restricted dominance and species-specific negative effects on native ants, emphasising the role of habitat context in mediating invasion impacts. Our results demonstrate that urban biodiversity is maximised by enhancing fine-scale habitat heterogeneity rather than increasing green cover alone. We highlight practical design principles for urban green infrastructure that prioritise structural diversity and ground-layer complexity to support resilient arthropod communities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.5%
3
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.3%
6
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
14
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
25
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
27
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%