Back

Local cooperative interactions reshape the folding transition in a one-dimensional spin-glass model

Mitra, R.; Jana, B.

2026-07-03 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.30.735452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein folding is the process by which a polypeptide chain organizes into its three-dimensional structure through a balance of stabilizing and destabilizing interactions encoded by the sequence. A central question in protein biophysics is how thermodynamic factors guide a polypeptide toward its native folded state despite the rugged energy landscape and the competing influence of nonnative interactions. In many biomolecular processes, cooperativity provides a mechanism by which multiple weak interactions act collectively to generate a robust response. In the context of protein folding, such cooperative effects may arise when the formation of one native contact enhances the stability or likelihood of nearby native contacts, thereby promoting collective organization toward the folded state. At the same time, folding is opposed by the much larger number of non-native interactions, whose heterogeneity can introduce frustration and destabilize folding even when the average native bias favors the folded phase. The interplay of these competing effects in determining foldability remains unclear in statistical-mechanical models. Here, we address this problem using a one-dimensional spin-glass model of protein folding with explicit shared-residue cooperative interactions encoded through wedge-based motifs. We show that modest cooperative bias can stabilize folding even where the noncooperative system remains unfolded, whereas non-native energetic fluctuation suppresses folding and shifts the transition to higher cooperative strengths. We further find that partial cooperative coverage is sufficient to lower the folding threshold. Therefore, the model provides a mean-field framework for incorporating cooperative interaction strength into the native one-dimensional model of protein folding and for describing how local cooperativity reshapes the folding transition.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
28.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.9%
3
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
6
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
18
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
20
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%