Back

Connectome quality converges predictably to reveal optimal stopping points during proofreading

Martinez, H.; Matelsky, J.; Xenes, D.; Merfeld, K.; Cavanaugh, C.; Rivlin, P.; Smith, C. J.; Wester, B.

2026-07-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.30.735414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Volumetric electron microscopy (EM) has become a critical approach to generating high-resolution reconstructions of brain tissue. As the size of EM volumes increase, use of automated image segmentation within the reconstruction pipeline has become essential, although it generates errors that need correction. The proofreading and correcting of these errors has since become the dominant cost driver in the pipeline, but precisely estimating the sufficient number of proofreading edits to enable meaningful scientific analyses of the reconstructed neuronal networks remains a challenge. We present a fast, computationally inexpensive way to estimate the progress of a connectomic proofreading effort without requiring a priori knowledge of ground truth. We show that simple global graph invariants converge predictably to asymptotic limits with increasing numbers of proofreading edits, informing a quantitative "pencils down" criterion for proofreading completeness. We illustrate our method on two datasets in different stages of proofreading progress, a zebrafish spinal cord and the hemibrain Drosophila melanogaster dataset. Our method reduces the uncertainty associated with the planning and prioritization of proofreading activities and enables data owners to accurately predict and budget the amount of proofreading necessary for their scientific questions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
16.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 10%
9.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
7
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
19
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
25
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%