Back

Interspecies Differential Gene Expression Analysis with Regularized Phylogenetic Linear Models

Gallopin, M.; Daunesse, M.; Lespinet, O.; Liehrmann, A.; Bastide, P.

2026-07-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.30.734542 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Comparative transcriptomic datasets are increasingly used to investigate the molecular basis of phenotypic diversification across species. However, finding genes that are differentially expressed (DE) between lineages remains challenging, for two main reasons. First, the random evolutionary drift can blur the signal left by lineage-specific shifts in mean expression, and induces phylogenetic correlations that, if ignored, can widely inflate the False Discovery Rate (FDR), i.e., the amount of spuriously detected genes. Second, DE analysis from RNA-Seq data involves multiple testing on many genes for a small number of individual measurements with high noise, and requires dedicated statistical tools. Traditional DE tools, such as limma, and classical Phylogenetic Comparative Methods (PCMs), such as the Expression Variance and Evolution (EVE) model, are both designed to tackle one of these two challenges alone, but both fail in the context of inter-species RNA-Seq data. In this work, we present phyloDE, a new tool for inter-species DE, that aims at taking the best from both approaches. On simulations based on a recently published four-species rodent dataset, we show that, contrary to other methods, phyloDE correctly controls the FDR in all settings, while keeping a reasonable power. When reanalyzing the empirical dataset, phyloDE discovers more DE genes that exhibit consistent changes in their cis-regulatory landscape compared to EVE in all the experimental settings. The method is implemented in R, with an interface inheriting from limma.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.4%
2
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
3
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
5
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
6
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
8
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.4%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
11
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
15
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%