Back

Persistent Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Pulsed Field Ablation Guided by Left Atrial Intracardiac Echocardiography: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes.

Mraiyan, M.; Nair, G.; Doty, B.; Nair, D. G.

2026-07-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356981 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) is a known consequence of transseptal catheterization. Left atrial intracardiac echocardiography (LA ICE) requires additional septal instrumentation, yet data on persistent iASD after pulsed field ablation (PFA) with an LA ICE workflow remain limited. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and one-year clinical significance of persistent iASD in this setting. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PFA for atrial fibrillation with LA ICE were prospectively evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography before ablation and at one year, including systematic agitated saline contrast. Persistent iASD was defined as residual interatrial shunting on color Doppler at follow-up, classified as small (<3 mm), moderate (3-5 mm), or large (>5 mm). Groups were compared by t-test and chi-square test. Results: Among 850 patients, persistent iASD was identified in 153 (18.0%) at one year; 97 (63.4%) were small and 56 (36.6%) moderate, with no large defects. All shunts were left-to-right. No stroke or transient ischemic attack, paradoxical embolism, hypoxemia, right-heart enlargement, or septal closure occurred. Persistent iASD was associated with female sex (64.7% vs 48.1%), longer septal dwell time (52{+/-}12 vs 31{+/-}11 min), higher left atrial pressure (28{+/-}4 vs 12{+/-}3 mmHg), lower LVEF (32{+/-}11% vs 54{+/-}14%), and larger-caliber sheaths ([&ge;]17 Fr; 80.4% vs 48.2%; all p<0.001). Conclusions: Persistent iASD following PFA with LA ICE occurs in approximately one in five patients but is predominantly small, exclusively left-to-right, and clinically benign at one year. Persistence is associated with mechanical and hemodynamic factors, particularly sheath caliber, rather than the ablation energy source.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
6
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Pulmonary Circulation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%
23
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%