Back

SubGaitNet: A Decision-Oriented and Interpretable AI Framework for Robust GRF-Based Gait Assessment in Neurological and Musculoskeletal Care

Li, W.; Chang, S.; Zhu, L.; Bao, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.; Lin, G. N.

2026-07-01 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356903 medRxiv
Show abstract

Ground reaction force (GRF)-based gait analysis provides objective, non-invasive evidence for neurological and musculoskeletal assessment, but its translation into medical AI decision support is limited by heterogeneous sensing devices, variable-length recordings, acquisition noise, sensor failures, and restricted access to high-cost gait laboratories. We propose SubGaitNet, a decision-oriented and interpretable AI framework designed to address four clinically relevant challenges in GRF-based medical AI: signal-length variability, sensing noise, long-range gait-phase dependency, and pathological frame-to-frame variability. SubGaitNet integrates GRF temporal slicing, multi-scale deep residual shrinkage, masked Transformer modeling, and a Sub-LSTM branch for adjacent-frame variability modeling. In subject-independent evaluation on two public clinical gait datasets, SubGaitNet achieved an AUC of 0.979 for Parkinson's disease (PD) screening and an ACC of 0.940/F1-score of 0.910 for Hoehn & Yahr severity assessment using wearable pressure insoles. On the GaitRec force-plate dataset, SubGaitNet achieved ACC values of 0.951 and 0.918 for four-class and five-class musculoskeletal impairment assessment, respectively. Additional analyses showed stable bootstrap confidence intervals, calibrated PD screening probabilities (Brier score = 0.059; expected calibration error = 0.051), positive decision-curve net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds, and ordinally plausible H&Y errors. Robustness tests under simulated sensor failure, noise perturbation, and reduced-channel inputs supported the model's stability under clinically plausible sensing uncertainty and accessibility constraints. SHAP explanations highlighted biomechanically meaningful hindfoot and forefoot regions. Overall, SubGaitNet provides a reusable, interpretable, and decision-support-oriented AI methodology for GRF-based gait health assessment, while prospective clinician-in-the-loop validation remains necessary before clinical deployment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.0%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.3%
4
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
6
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
10
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
16
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%