Back

HyTrax: Deep Sequential Modeling of Serial Musculoskeletal Measurements for Fracture Prediction in the Women's Health Initiative with External Evaluation in the Framingham Heart Study

Jung, J.; Wu, Q.

2026-07-02 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356875 medRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical utility of monitoring longitudinal changes in musculoskeletal trajectories, including bone mineral density (BMD), muscle strength, height, and weight for fracture prediction, remains underutilized, as current gold-standard tools such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) rely solely on cross-sectional baseline data. This study aimed to determine whether a deep learning model integrating individualized musculoskeletal trajectories improves fracture prediction accuracy compared to established static benchmarks. We developed the Hybrid Trajectory-Based model (HyTrax), a Transformer-based deep learning model that encodes sequential measurements of hip and spine BMD, grip strength, height, and weight as temporal tokens, incorporating subject-specific slopes derived from linear mixed-effects models. The model was trained and internally validated in 27,512 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and externally evaluated in 1,193 participants from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS). In the WHI validation set, the HyTrax + FRAX (BMD) ensemble model achieved a time-dependent Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.85 for Major Osteoporotic Fracture, outperforming both the longitudinal Transformer alone (AUC = 0.80) and the standard FRAX-BMD model (AUC = 0.82). The HyTrax + FRAX (BMD) ensemble model demonstrated favorable discrimination and improved risk stratification (Net Reclassification Improvement +26.5%) in WHI. Evaluation in the FHS cohort demonstrated the transportability of the longitudinal embeddings, with the HyTrax + Baseline 2 ensemble model (integrating longitudinal embeddings with clinical risk factors, BMD, and grip strength) achieving an AUC of 0.74. Explainability analyses identified early longitudinal weight fluctuations and overall height loss trajectories as important predictors of future fracture risk, alongside static factors such as age and genetic predisposition. By leveraging individualized trajectories through deep sequential modeling with baseline FRAX probability, the HyTrax + FRAX (BMD) ensemble model improved fracture discrimination over static assessments, offering a framework for incorporating repeated clinical measures into fracture prediction.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.3%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.1%
3
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.0%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.3%
7
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
19
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%