Back

Baseline neurological exposome characteristics in a nationwide community-based screening cohort for movement disorders in marginalized and integrated Roma populations

Fricova, D.; Belak, A.; Necpal, J.; Ferenc, M.; Giertlova, M.; Krauz, M.; Balko, R.; Baranova, A.; Buransky, M.; Drencakova, P.; Grofik, M.; Gurcik, L.; Han, V.; Haring, J.; Jaselska, S.; Jelenova, B.; Kalafusova, G.; Koren, M.; Kulcsarova, K.; Kusnirova, A.; Mosejova, A.; Mankos, J.; Matiskova, Z.; Mazerikova, Z.; Mistrik, M.; Okalova, K.; Orkuty, S.; Ostrozovicova, M.; Papikova, J.; Shabatiuk, O.; Trckova, L.; Skorvanek, M.; PURE-MD study group,

2026-07-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356866 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Roma, the largest ethnic minority in Europe,, are almost absent from movement-disorder research despite living in environments with biomass combustion, poor sanitation, and unprotected water, creating a high-risk neurological exposome. Objective: To describe baseline exposome profiles in a nationwide Roma screening cohort and compare exposures between marginalized and integrated communities, and between screen-positive and screen-negative participants. Methods: A nationwide community-based program combined door-to-door recruitment of marginalized Roma with recruitment of integrated Roma through neurological services. Participants completed standardized exposome questionnaires and a brief, non-diagnostic motor symptom screen. Results: Among 541 Roma (350 marginalized; 191 integrated), marginalized participants showed greater environmental and socioeconomic disadvantage, and screen-positive individuals tended to cluster at the more adverse end of this exposome spectrum. Conclusion: This nationwide Roma movement-disorder screening cohort with exposome assessment reveals substantial disparities relevant for future clinical and genetic research.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.