Back

Healthy diet perceptions and drivers of fruit and vegetable food choices among adolescents in Benin: a qualitative study

Diatta, A. D.; Bodjrenou, F. S. U.; Pedehombga, A.; Eissler, S.; Mitchodigni, I. M.; Cunningham, K.; Olney, D.; Bliznashka, L.; Iruhiriye, E.

2026-07-01 nutrition
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356853 medRxiv
Show abstract

Globally, 75% of adolescents do not meet recommendations for fruits and vegetables (F&V) consumption. This study investigated drivers of F&V choices among adolescents in Benin and identified barriers and facilitators to modifying F&V consumption. We conducted 16 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 126 adolescents and 5 semi-structured school observations in December 2024. FGDs were purposively chosen to explore variation by region (north/south), school location (urban/rural), adolescent age (12 to 15 years/16-18 years) and gender (boys/girls). Inductive and deductive thematic content analysis was performed using Atlas.ti. Findings showed that adolescents perceived a healthy diet as one composed of meals providing nutrients and strength, and including F&V. At home, adolescents mentioned eating staples and other vegetables more than other food groups. The foods adolescents reported typically eating at school varied by age, gender, and location. The primary categories of factors that influenced adolescent F&V choices were: intrapersonal (knowledge related to healthy eating and the nutrition and health benefits of F&V, taste preferences, and health prioritisation), socio-cultural (family and peer influences), and food environment (low availability, low affordability, convenience, and desirability). DFC factors were consistent across adolescent age, gender, and location. Multiple, dynamic, and multilevel factors influence adolescent F&V choices. Interventions that simultaneously address multiple barriers and involve family and peers are likely to be more successful in promoting F&V consumption and healthy diets than interventions only addressing individual barriers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
18.0%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
6
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.9%
10
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
11
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%