Back

Barriers to surgical care delivery are harming our planet: a case for decentralized provider services

Hyman, G. Y.; Reddy, R.; Wurdeman, T.; Crew, R. P.; Shrime, M. G.

2026-07-02 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.30.26354345 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Surgical care centralization in the U.S. delays access and increases carbon emissions. Global targets suggest patients live within 2-hours of a surgical facility. This study quantifies the environmental impact of travel for cataract surgery in rural Michigan and models the potential emissions reductions from decentralizing surgical and follow-up services. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed electronic medical records from a rural Michigan ophthalmology practice (March-November 2023). We calculated travel distances using population-weighted centroids and estimated emissions using U.S. Department of Energy vehicle data. A k-means clustering model optimized additional facility placement, and a gradient analysis identified optimal numbers for decentralization points, for emissions reductions. Results: The 920 patients traveled a median of 55.45 km (IQR: 43.33-88.20 km) for surgery and 55.07 km (IQR: 43.54-87.82 km) for follow-up visits, generating Total Surgical Access Emissions (TSAE) of 57,168 kgCO2; (median of 59.20 kgCO2; IQR: 32.31-81.87) under the centralized model. The k-means decentralization model and gradient analysis identified 7 hospitals and 9 clinics, respectively, as the optimal expansion points, reducing emissions by 34.07% (19,475 kgCO2 saved) and 39.52% (22,590 kgCO2; saved). The Surgical Access Carbon Impact (SACI) model demonstrated that achieving two-hour access to clinic services reduced excess emissions by 54.7%. Sensitivity analyses using fuel-efficient vehicles (Toyota Prius and Tesla Model 3) or reducing follow-up visit frequency reduced emissions by 54.03% (30,888 kgCO2) and 25.83% (14,768 kgCO2), respectively. Conclusion: Decentralizing surgical services in rural U.S. settings could cut travel-related emissions by up to 40%, significantly reducing healthcare-related carbon footprints while improving timely access to care. The SACI metric provides a novel framework for integrating environmental sustainability into U.S. health policy and service planning

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
8.0%
4
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
30
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%