Back

Kinetic Lipidomics: Quantifying in vivo changes in lipid metabolism using metabolic labeling

Nielsen, C.; Denton, R.; Driggs, B.; Gates, S.; Hilton, T.; Naylor, B.; Quilling, C.; Virgin, K.; Cutler, K.; Sorensen, M.; Poulson, M.; Snedaker, P.; Hernandez, Z.; Transtrum, M.; Price, J. C.

2026-07-01 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.29.735310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lipid metabolism reflects the dynamic balance between metabolic turnover and concentration. Kinetic mass spectrometry (MS) enables direct quantification of molecular turnover in vivo. Previous work has shown that MS-based kinetic proteomics has provided powerful insights into proteome regulation. Analogous lipidome-wide kinetic measurements remain limited by challenges in defining molecule-specific labeling behavior. Here, we extend kinetic MS to untargeted lipidomics. Isotope labeling with deuterated water (2H2O) is commonly used for monitoring turnover of palmitate and other select lipids by measuring labeling of stable CH positions with deuterium (2H). Here, we extend the deuterium-incorporation model underlying these targeted lipid turnover assays to support untargeted analysis of all detectable lipids. This allows us to empirically quantify the effective fraction of endogenous synthesis (Asyn) and the turnover rate (k) across hundreds of lipid species simultaneously. One central barrier to lipidome-wide kinetic modeling is determining the endogenous number of deuterium-labeling sites for each molecule (nL) which is required to estimate Asyn and k accurately. The nL value is an essential component of biological kinetic assays. In kinetic proteomics, curated amino acid nL libraries enable peptide-level modeling by summing sequence-specific labeling-site values, but comparable resources are lacking for lipids and may not generalize across metabolic states or non-mammalian systems. Yet, gaps remain for lipids and for amino acids in modified metabolic conditions or non-mammalian biologies. Here, we empirically determine lipid nL values and validate the process with peptides against an nL library. To evaluate this strategy in a biologically relevant setting, we applied it to brain tissue from transgenic mice expressing human ApoE isoforms, where altered lipid transport and metabolism are implicated in Alzheimers disease risk. These data validate the method in a clinically relevant context and suggest that genotype-dependent metabolism can alter empirically determined lipid nL values.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
6
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
7
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
9
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%