Back

Declaration of Fermentation: Community-Embedded Wild Yeast Bioprospecting as a Model for Place-Based CURE Design

Gray, S. J.; Taylor, K.; Shumaker, K. A.; Bochman, M. L.

2026-07-01 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735295 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are widely recognized as a high-impact practice in biology education, yet most existing CURE frameworks treat the research organism as an interchangeable teaching prop rather than a genuine scientific contribution. We argue that place-based, community-embedded CUREs - in which students isolate, characterize, and publicly deploy a locally meaningful wild organism - constitute a qualitatively distinct model warranting broader adoption. As proof of concept, we present the Declaration of Fermentation project at Indiana University Bloomington: graduate researchers isolated a wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain from the bark of a campus landmark tree, confirmed its wild provenance by whole-genome sequencing and phylogenomics, and partnered with local craft breweries to produce a colonial-era inspired ale released publicly for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Volunteer sensory panels at two independent public tasting events (combined n = 33-34 per attribute) confirmed a fruity-funky profile consistent with wild-strain fermentation, with no significant differences between events (Mann-Whitney U, Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p > 0.05 for all 11 attributes). We describe three design principles - genomically confirmed strain identity, mandatory community partnership, and place-based historical narrative - that distinguish this model from prior wild yeast brewing CUREs, discuss how these principles generalize to other institutions and fermentation vehicles, and identify next steps for formal learning assessment. Complete implementation protocols are provided as supplemental Appendices 1-6, and the bioinformatics pipeline is freely available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20679384.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 9%
9.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
4
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.2%
5
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
7
Yeast
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
9
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
27
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
29
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
30
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%