Back

Light spectral quality alters glandular trichome architecture more strongly than cannabinoid accumulation in Cannabis sativa

Dlaymi, S.;Perovich, R.;Kuo, C.;Liu, R.;Fetterley, V.;Lee, A.;Harris, C.;Todesco, M.;Samuels, A.;Cvetkovska, M.

2026-06-30 Plant Biology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735290 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The glandular trichomes in Cannabis sativa, found predominantly on female flowers, produce and store a variety of unique phytocannabinoids, increasingly studied for their use in medicinal applications. Maximizing yield and cannabinoid profiles requires the optimization of the environmental factors that regulate plant growth. Light plays a prominent role, both as an energy source but also as an important developmental signal. Thus, optimization of lighting strategies, particularly through customizable light-emitting diode (LED) fixtures, has become a major focus of controlled-environment cannabis research. Here, we focus on the effect of blue-enriched and far red-enriched light spectra on the morphological traits and biochemical profiles of two THCA-dominant varieties: Pineapple Cough and Rocky Fire #7. Spectral composition exerts modest and genotype-specific effects on the plant development, inflorescence biomass, and cannabinoid concentration but we demonstrate a positive correlation between total yield and plant height in both varieties, regardless of spectra. We also show that growth under far-red enriched light affects the visible pigmentation in both varieties with significantly lower chlorophyll levels and paler fan and sugar leaves. Finally, we demonstrate that far-red light consistently increased the trichome stalk length in both varieties, suggesting that spectral composition can alter trichome development and morphology. Our data offers insights into cannabis development and secondary chemical profiles in response to different light spectra, allowing growers to adjust light spectra to obtain desirable cannabis traits for industrial production.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
30.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.9%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
6
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
12
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
13
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
16
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
28
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%