Back

Spatial localisation of touch on a robotic limb in the absence of direct haptic feedback

Foster, C.; Giancane, M.; Peviani, V. C.; Dott, A.; Chapman, E.; Kleiner, M.; Miller, L. E.; Oddo, C. M.; Clode, D.; Makin, T. R.

2026-07-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.29.735244 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial limbs typically lack somatosensory receptors, limiting users' access to haptic feedback about movement outcomes. However, indirect tactile signals generated during object interaction are transmitted to the body-limb interface and may serve as a haptic feedback source. This study investigates whether such indirect tactile signals convey distinct information that can support localisation of touch on an artificial body part. Using an additional robotic thumb (The Third Thumb, Dani Clode Design), we measured tactile signals at the interface between the Third Thumb and the hand following stimulation from four vibration motors positioned along the Thumb. We then assessed whether participants could discriminate these signals and integrate them with different Thumb postures to spatially localise touch. Measurements showed that each stimulation site produced distinct tactile signatures at the interface. Behaviourally, participants localised touch at above-chance levels. Representational similarity analyses further revealed that performance was best explained by the spatial positions of stimuli, rather than by limb-based coordinates or indirect signal patterns alone, indicating flexible mapping of indirect touch signals onto the Third Thumb posture. Together, these findings demonstrate that indirect tactile signals transmitted through an artificial limb can be discriminated and flexibly remapped to support spatial localisation of touch.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.7%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.0%
3
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
5
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.4%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
26
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%