Back

Perceptual, metacognitive, and computational signatures of temporal landmark uncertainty in tactile motion perception

Adibi, M.

2026-07-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.29.735212 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motion perception depends on estimating the relative timing of sensory events under internal uncertainty. Although perceptual uncertainty is commonly represented by a single internal noise parameter, its structure, sources, and temporal organisation remain poorly understood. Here, I investigated the computational structure of internal uncertainty in phase-based tactile motion perception using continuous amplitude-modulated vibrations delivered simultaneously to two fingertips. Motion discrimination accuracy, response latency, confidence, and confidence entropy exhibited systematic phase-dependent changes, revealing distinct behavioural signatures of temporal uncertainty. Computational analyses demonstrated that tactile motion perception is not explained by a single source of landmark timing uncertainty. Instead, behavioural performance was best accounted for by two additive uncertainty components: an amplitude-dependent component associated with extracting temporal landmarks from the vibration envelope, and an amplitude-independent component shared across stimulus conditions. This dual uncertainty framework consistently explained the frequency dependence of motion perception, the reduced uncertainty observed for sharper vibration envelopes, and the previously reported enhancement of motion perception with exponential compared with sinusoidal modulation. An independent temporal order judgement experiment further validated the uncertainty parameter inferred from motion discrimination, demonstrating that sharpening temporal landmarks reduced timing uncertainty by 35%. Finally, manipulating the initial stimulus state showed that perceptual choices followed the temporal sequence and correspondence of landmark events rather than the initial evolution of the vibration envelopes, providing independent support for landmark-based computations. these findings demonstrate that tactile motion perception is governed by multiple computational sources of landmark timing uncertainty and establish phase-based tactile motion as a tractable paradigm for independently measuring, manipulating, and modelling the computational structure of perceptual uncertainty underlying sensory decisions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.6%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
24
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
28
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%