Back

Molecular determinants of differential substrate selection between the Src family kinases Lck and Src

Karpouzou, K.;D\'Abramo, M.;Grottesi, A.;Acuto, O.;Nika, K.

2026-06-29 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735195 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Src family kinases (SFKs) share highly conserved catalytic domains yet display distinct biological functions, raising the question of how substrate specificity is achieved. Here, we investigate the molecular basis of differential ITAM recognition by Lck and Src, combining cellular assays with structural analysis and docking simulations. In-cell assays demonstrated that, contrary to Lck, Src was completely incapable of phosphorylating the TCR ITAMs when ectopically expressed in a T cell environment. Domain-swapping experiments further revealed that substitution of the Src kinase domain with that of Lck was sufficient to confer ITAM phosphorylation and trigger downstream TCR signaling responses, whereas exchange of adaptor domains had minimal effect. Comparative structural analysis revealed that, despite their overall conserved fold, Lck exhibits a more open and solvent accessible pocket located between the N- and C-lobes of the kinase domain, adjacent to the activation loop, compared to Src. Consistent with this, docking simulations showed that Lck accommodates ITAM peptides in multiple favourable conformations, whereas Src displays a markedly reduced number of non-productive binding poses. Residue-level contact analysis identified a defined interaction surface in Lck, spanning the inter-lobal regions and activation loop. Our results highlight the importance of kinase domain conformational landscape in shaping substrate selectivity and have implications for the rational design of selective SFK inhibitors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
2
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.4%
6
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
11
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.0%
14
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
17
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%