Back

HiFi-ST: High-Fidelity Reconstruction of Continuous Spatial Transcriptomic Expression Fields via Conditional Neural Fields

Li, H.; Tang, L.; Han, W.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.

2026-07-02 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.29.735170 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics characterizes tissue-scale gene expression patterns, yet its observations are sparse discrete samples of an underlying continuous molecular field, leading to spatial aliasing and sub-resolution information loss. Existing methods usually formulate this task as spot-level point regression, making it difficult to capture both expression continuity and the regional nature of observation. Here, we propose HiFi-ST, a conditional neural field framework for continuous spatial transcriptomics modeling. HiFi-ST formulates spatial gene expression prediction as continuous expression field learning, models each spot as a regional observation over a finite support domain, approximates local integration through Monte Carlo sampling, and integrates multiscale tissue feature extraction with FiLM-based conditional modulation to improve modeling of complex spatial heterogeneity and consistency with the underlying measurement process. Systematic evaluation on three independent datasets (HER2+, cSCC, and Alex_NatGen) showed that HiFi-ST outperformed mclSTExp, BLEEP, THItoGene, His2ST, and HisToGene on key metrics. On HER2+, HiFi-ST achieved an average PCC improvement of 65.1% and an average MSE reduction of 40.9%; on cSCC, PCC improved by 10.2% and MSE decreased by 51.2%; on Alex_NatGen, PCC improved by 80.0% and MSE decreased by 16.3%. In addition, the learned multiscale tissue representations supported downstream spatial immunoanalysis, including assisted identification of candidate TLS regions. Overall, HiFi-ST provides a unified framework bridging discrete measurements and continuous expression field reconstruction for tumor microenvironment analysis and spatial immune structure characterization.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.9%
3
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
4
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
8
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
26
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%