Back

Latitudinal effects on weight and age-dependent survival of red fox Vulpes vulpes

Willebrand, T.; Odden, M.; Ostbye, K.; Samelius, G.; Walton, Z.; Spong, G.; Englund, J.

2026-06-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Age-dependent survival is central to understanding population dynamics and life-history evolution. We analysed carcass weight and age-at-harvest data from 6022 red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) collected across Sweden between 1967 and 1971 to evaluate latitudinal effects on body mass and age-dependent survival. Carcass weights decreased from south to north in both adults and sub-adults, contrary to Bergmann's rule, with southern foxes weighing approximately 1.27 times more than northern foxes. The latitudinal weight gradient exceeded the sex difference in both age classes, and no sex x region interaction was detected. The decrease in weight with latitude is consistent with reduced prey availability and harsher winter conditions in the north, which limit growth and body size during development. Using a Bayesian age-at-harvest model with region-specific population growth rates (lambda), we estimated age-dependent survival probabilities for four latitudinal regions and both sexes. Despite the strong latitudinal gradient in weight, survival did not show a corresponding pattern - regional differences were uncertain, with all credible intervals spanning zero. Regional population growth rates were consistent with slight decline in the north and near-stability in the south-central region, which suggests that body condition and population dynamics are coupled at the regional scale despite no survival gradient. The decoupling of body condition and survival across regions suggests that mortality patterns are similar across the latitudinal gradient. We discuss these patterns in terms of latitudinal productivity gradients, prey availability, and life-history trade-offs in a widely distributed carnivore.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.6%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
10
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
24
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
26
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%