Back

Multi-modality Graph Representation Learning for Malignant Cell Identification from scRNA-seq using DeepMalignant

Bhattarrai, P.; Yuan, W.; Chi, H.; Zhou, X. M.; Mallory, X.

2026-07-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.29.734828 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Distinguishing malignant from normal cells in single-cell RNA sequencing data remains a critical yet challenging task in cancer genomics. Existing methods often suffer from poor precision, limited generalizability across cancer types, and reduced robustness across different sequencing platforms. We developed DeepMalignant, an unsupervised multimodal graph attention autoencoder for malignant cell identification that jointly integrates gene expression and copy number alteration (CNA) information. We applied DeepMalignant to five datasets covering 26 samples and four cancer types (breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers), generated by three platforms (10x Genomics, inDrop, and Drop-seq) for benchmarking and compared it with existing state-of-the-art methods including scMalignantFinder, PreCanCell, CopyKAT, ikarus, and Cancer-Finder. DeepMalignant achieved the best overall balance of precision and recall and consistently outperformed the existing methods that used either gene expression or CNA in F1 scores. Ablation studies showed that both CNA-based edge weighting and graph attention aggregation contribute independently to performance, and attribution analysis further indicated that the learned embeddings capture biologically meaningful malignant programs. We further applied DeepMalignant to two ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples, DCIS2 and DCIS1, that have matched spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq data. DeepMalignant identified tumor-enriched regions that were highly consistent with the matched histological image. The downstream cell-cell communications analysis revealed that fibroblast-derived C3 and MIF both directed signaling more toward normal epithelial cells than tumor epithelial cells, demonstrating that accurate tumor-normal cell classification by DeepMalignant enables biologically meaningful interrogation of the tumor microenvironment and revealing how stromal cells differentially communicate with malignant versus normal epithelial populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 3%
30.0%
2
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.3%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
4
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
5
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
9
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
12
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
13
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
18
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
20
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
25
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%