Back

Neural Tracking of Speech Envelope as an Index of Spatial Release from Masking

Galeano-Otalvaro, J.-D.; Dieudonne, B.; Francart, T.; Wouters, J.

2026-07-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.29.734758 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding speech in noisy environments relies strongly on binaural cues such as interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs), which support spatial hearing and the segregation of competing sound sources. When these cues are degraded, listeners experience substantial difficulty in complex acoustic environments. Behavioural measures of binaural benefit, such as binaural masking level differences (BMLDs), binaural intelligibility level differences (BILDs), and spatial release from masking (SRM), are well established in normal-hearing (NH) listeners, but they require an active behavioural response. Neural speech tracking using electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a promising approach for quantifying neural processing of continuous speech, yet its sensitivity to spatial hearing cues remains insufficiently characterised. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates of spatial release from masking in NH listeners using EEG-based neural speech tracking. Nineteen participants listened to continuous Dutch speech stories presented with masking noise under two spatial configurations, collocated (S0N0) and spatially separated (S0N90), across multiple signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Neural tracking of the speech envelope was quantified using both envelope reconstruction and temporal response function (TRF) analyses. Spatial separation enhanced neural tracking of the target speech envelope, particularly at challenging SNRs where behavioural SRM was also observed. TRF analysis further revealed condition-dependent morphologies, including increased amplitudes and decreased latencies of late cortical components consistent with spatial unmasking effects. These neural differences were most pronounced at low SNRs, where spatial cues provide the greatest perceptual benefit. Together, these findings demonstrate that neural speech tracking captures cortical signatures of spatial unmasking and closely reflects behavioural improvements in speech understanding. Establishing these relationships in NH listeners supports the development of objective neural measures for evaluating binaural benefit in difficult-to-test populations.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.8%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
4
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
12
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.2%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
15
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
17
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
18
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
22
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%
27
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%