Back

1 Hz rTMS Is Not Inherently Inhibitory: Current Direction Determines Aftereffects and Reliability

Kanig, C.; Osnabruegge, M.; Tomasevic, L.; Langguth, B.; Mack, W.; Schoisswohl, S.

2026-07-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.29.732840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Aftereffects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) often differ within and between subjects and thus show low reliability. In this study we investigated the mean and individual aftereffects of 1 Hz rTMS using two opposing current directions, their reliability and potential influences of current direction, participants' sex and state on cortical excitability modulations. Methods: Thirteen healthy, right-handed participants underwent four experimental sessions separated by at least 7 days receiving 2000 pulses of suprathreshold 1 Hz rTMS over the primary motor cortex per session. Two sessions were conducted with an induced current direction of anterior-posterior - posterior-anterior (AP-PA) and two sessions with a PA-AP current direction. Before and after rTMS, 100 single TMS pulses were administered with the respective current direction and electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous. Questionnaires on demographic data and subjective ratings were completed during the experiment. Results: Linear mixed effect model analysis revealed that 1 Hz rTMS induced an excitatory aftereffect when applied with the PA-AP current direction, and no aftereffect with AP-PA. There was a substantial interindividual variability with only three subjects showing an inhibition to 1 Hz rTMS overall. Also, current direction was the only predictor of rTMS aftereffect. Reliability values of these aftereffects were in the poor to moderate range. Conclusions: Current direction plays a crucial role in determining 1 Hz rTMS aftereffects. Reliability was found to be moderate at best. Additional to current direction, more factors need to be considered to tailor the 1 Hz rTMS aftereffects individually.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
4
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.4%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
9
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
14
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
16
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
20
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
24
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
27
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
30
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%