Patient perspectives on cardioprotective medication during breast cancer treatment
Houston, L.; Bagegni, N. A.; Yap, M. L.; Lim, E.; Neal, B.; Deswal, A.; Mitchell, J. D.; Arnott, C.; Yoo, S. G. K.
Show abstract
Background: Cardiotoxicity remains a key concern of HER2-directed therapies, with no proven prevention strategies. The success of cardioprotective interventions will depend not only on efficacy, but on patient acceptability, an underexplored determinant of trial participation and clinical implementation. Objectives: To evaluate willingness to take cardioprotective medication and identify factors influencing decision-making among individuals with HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults with HER2-positive breast cancer in Australia and the United States. The survey assessed willingness, beliefs regarding benefits and risks, and treatment preferences. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between clinical and demographic characteristics and willingness. Results: Among 74 respondents (Australia n=24; United States n=50), 74.3% reported being likely or very likely to take cardioprotective medication. Physician recommendation emerged as a dominant driver (79.1%). While most participants valued long-term cardiovascular health (72.9%), uncertainty regarding benefit was common (60.4%). Cancer-related outcomes were prioritized over cardiovascular outcomes. Participants demonstrated flexibility regarding treatment burden, including willingness to take multiple medications and continue therapy long term. No demographic or clinical predictors of willingness were identified. Perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were consistently high. Conclusions: Willingness to adopt cardioprotective strategies is high but conditional, shaped by cancer priorities, clinician endorsement, and uncertainty regarding benefit. These findings highlight patient acceptability as a critical, and often overlooked, determinant of successful trial participation and downstream clinical implementation in cardio-oncology.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 93%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 91%
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiac Post-acute Sequelae symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in Community-Dwelling Adults: Cross-sectional Study 91%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 90%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 89%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 89%
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity – a randomized controlled trial 93%
- Effects of Singing on Vascular Health in Older Adults with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial 90%
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Statin Adherence: Insights from the All of Us Research Program 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.