Back

Patient perspectives on cardioprotective medication during breast cancer treatment

Houston, L.; Bagegni, N. A.; Yap, M. L.; Lim, E.; Neal, B.; Deswal, A.; Mitchell, J. D.; Arnott, C.; Yoo, S. G. K.

2026-07-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356895 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Cardiotoxicity remains a key concern of HER2-directed therapies, with no proven prevention strategies. The success of cardioprotective interventions will depend not only on efficacy, but on patient acceptability, an underexplored determinant of trial participation and clinical implementation. Objectives: To evaluate willingness to take cardioprotective medication and identify factors influencing decision-making among individuals with HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults with HER2-positive breast cancer in Australia and the United States. The survey assessed willingness, beliefs regarding benefits and risks, and treatment preferences. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between clinical and demographic characteristics and willingness. Results: Among 74 respondents (Australia n=24; United States n=50), 74.3% reported being likely or very likely to take cardioprotective medication. Physician recommendation emerged as a dominant driver (79.1%). While most participants valued long-term cardiovascular health (72.9%), uncertainty regarding benefit was common (60.4%). Cancer-related outcomes were prioritized over cardiovascular outcomes. Participants demonstrated flexibility regarding treatment burden, including willingness to take multiple medications and continue therapy long term. No demographic or clinical predictors of willingness were identified. Perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were consistently high. Conclusions: Willingness to adopt cardioprotective strategies is high but conditional, shaped by cancer priorities, clinician endorsement, and uncertainty regarding benefit. These findings highlight patient acceptability as a critical, and often overlooked, determinant of successful trial participation and downstream clinical implementation in cardio-oncology.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.1%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
6
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
9
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
10
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
13
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
16
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
22
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
24
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
25
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%