Back

Cluster analysis of ME/CFS symptoms in DecodeME reveals two subgroups and a link to onset type

St-Jean, C.; Dibble, J. J.; Ponting, C. P.; Prigge, R.

2026-07-01 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356818 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating, often infection-triggered illness with no cure and no effective treatment. Marked symptom heterogeneity hampers diagnosis, disease management, and trial design. Using phenotype data from the world's largest ME/CFS cohort, this study aimed to identify groups of patients with similar symptom profiles using cluster analysis, to assess the association between cluster membership and onset type, and to explore genetic associations with cluster membership. Methods: This study included 19,019 DecodeME participants, ages 16 and over, with ME/CFS in the UK, from 2022-2024. We performed a k-modes cluster analysis of individuals based on similar symptoms. Cluster metrics identified the optimal number of clusters, which were characterised and compared. A sex-stratified subgroup analysis explored differences between clusters among males and females. The association between ME/CFS onset type (infectious, non-infectious, or unknown) and cluster membership was assessed with logistic regression models, adjusting for sex, age, deprivation, and ethnicity. Genetic associations with cluster membership were assessed using a genome-wide association study. Results: We identified two clusters in our study population: a high symptom burden cluster (HSBC; 57% of participants) and a lower symptom burden cluster (LSBC; 43%). The HSBC was characterised by higher prevalence of symptoms across all domains, more comorbidities, and greater illness severity. Individuals with infectious and unknown onset had 1.24 times (95% CI: 1.15-1.35) and 1.30 times (95% CI: 1.18-1.43) higher adjusted odds of HSBC membership relative to non-infectious onset, respectively. A similar pattern was observed in the sex-stratified analyses, although it showed an overall higher symptom prevalence for females and a higher proportion of females in the HSBC compared to males. No genetic variant was significantly associated with cluster membership. Conclusions: This large-scale cluster analysis of DecodeME symptom data reinforces that ME/CFS is a heterogeneous condition with clinical subtypes. The identification of symptom-based phenotypes, along with sex-based differences in symptom burden and cluster characteristics, highlights the importance of incorporating symptom burden and sex in future research, clinical decision-making, and public health strategies. Tailoring future interventions to these subgroups could enhance patient management and improve outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
2
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
4
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
6
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
23
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%