Sex-Specific Patterns of Left Ventricular Remodeling Using Regional Wall Thickness Data and Their Associations with Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Rospleszcz, S.; Ittermann, T.; Woeckel, M.; Schipf, S.; Schuppert, C.; Storz, C.; Lorbeer, R.; Bülow, R.; Dörr, M.; Felix, S. B.; Templin, C.; Völzke, H.; Peters, A.; Bamberg, F.; Schlett, C. L.; Markus, M. R. P.
Show abstract
Background: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is associated with impaired cardiac function and future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current remodeling definitions use broad categorizations based on hypertrophy and mean wall thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides detailed characterization of regional myocardial wall properties, which may enhance sex-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification. Objectives: We aimed to identify detailed LV remodeling patterns, their associations with CVD risk, and their clinical predictors. Methods: LV wall thickness data were obtained by CMR in three independent population-based cohorts (SHIP-TREND-0, n=931; SHIP-START-2, n=490; KORA-FF4, n=368). Sex-specific remodeling patterns were identified by k-means clustering and associated with established CVD risk scores and incident morbidity and all-cause mortality. Bootstrapped multinomial regression with LASSO regularization was used to select relevant clinical predictors of remodeling patterns. Results: The sample comprised 991 men (mean age 52.9 years, prevalent CVD 7.8%) and 798 women (52.5 years, 2%). Four remodeling clusters were found for men and women, respectively. For a subset of these clusters, significant associations with an increased CVD risk were found, e.g. in women, the high-risk cluster was associated with a 10.6 (95% confidence interval: 8.9, 12.3) percentage point increase in the 10-year Framingham Risk Score. Associations were independent of blood pressure and myocardial mass. Only in women, associations were also independent of average wall thickness and LV concentricity. Variable selection identified distinct clinical predictors of remodeling patterns. Conclusion: Particularly in women, regional LV wall thickness patterns detect unfavorable cardiac remodeling and might improve CVD risk stratification beyond existing strategies. Automated implementation during image acquisition and integration with shape-based models may facilitate clinical application.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deciphering human heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at single cell resolution 94%
- Cardiac impairment in Long Covid 1-year post-SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 94%
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on the structural and functional substrate for atrial fibrillation in people with metabolic syndrome 94%
- Familial risk of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive and obstructive coronary arteries-A nation-wide cohort study 94%
- Excess deaths in people with cardiovascular diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Left ventricular mass and global wall thickness – prognostic utility and characterization of left ventricular hypertrophy 96%
- Improved evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy using the spatial QRS-T angle by electrocardiography 95%
- Myocardial deformation imaging by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography for assessment of diastolic dysfunction in murine cardiopathology 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.