Back

Sex-Specific Patterns of Left Ventricular Remodeling Using Regional Wall Thickness Data and Their Associations with Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Rospleszcz, S.; Ittermann, T.; Woeckel, M.; Schipf, S.; Schuppert, C.; Storz, C.; Lorbeer, R.; Bülow, R.; Dörr, M.; Felix, S. B.; Templin, C.; Völzke, H.; Peters, A.; Bamberg, F.; Schlett, C. L.; Markus, M. R. P.

2026-07-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356804 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is associated with impaired cardiac function and future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current remodeling definitions use broad categorizations based on hypertrophy and mean wall thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides detailed characterization of regional myocardial wall properties, which may enhance sex-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification. Objectives: We aimed to identify detailed LV remodeling patterns, their associations with CVD risk, and their clinical predictors. Methods: LV wall thickness data were obtained by CMR in three independent population-based cohorts (SHIP-TREND-0, n=931; SHIP-START-2, n=490; KORA-FF4, n=368). Sex-specific remodeling patterns were identified by k-means clustering and associated with established CVD risk scores and incident morbidity and all-cause mortality. Bootstrapped multinomial regression with LASSO regularization was used to select relevant clinical predictors of remodeling patterns. Results: The sample comprised 991 men (mean age 52.9 years, prevalent CVD 7.8%) and 798 women (52.5 years, 2%). Four remodeling clusters were found for men and women, respectively. For a subset of these clusters, significant associations with an increased CVD risk were found, e.g. in women, the high-risk cluster was associated with a 10.6 (95% confidence interval: 8.9, 12.3) percentage point increase in the 10-year Framingham Risk Score. Associations were independent of blood pressure and myocardial mass. Only in women, associations were also independent of average wall thickness and LV concentricity. Variable selection identified distinct clinical predictors of remodeling patterns. Conclusion: Particularly in women, regional LV wall thickness patterns detect unfavorable cardiac remodeling and might improve CVD risk stratification beyond existing strategies. Automated implementation during image acquisition and integration with shape-based models may facilitate clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
9.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.6%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
7
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
9
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
10
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
14
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
22
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%