Automated Melanoma Screening: A Machine Learning Pipeline for Mole Detection, Boundary Segmentation, and ABCD(E) Feature Extraction
Abdolahnejad, M.; Pascazi, E.; Lee, M.; Cheng, J.; Poon, F.; Kyeremeh, M.; Chan, H. O.; Joshi, R.; Hong, C.
Show abstract
Early detection of suspicious moles remains the most effective means of reducing mortality from skin cancer, yet systematic screening is constrained by the time and expertise required for manual mole assessment. This paper presents an end-to-end computational pipeline that utilizes wide-angle skin photographs (including consumer-grade smartphone images) and produces quantitative ABCD (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter) feature scores for every detected mole. The pipeline operates in four stages: mole detection via adaptive thresholding and blob analysis, super-resolution enhancement using EDSR, false-positive filtering using a brightness-based statistical criterion, and lesion segmentation using the Boundary Attention Mapper (BAM). BAM generates high-resolution segmentation masks by fusing early-layer activations with GradCAM heatmaps from a trained EfficientNet-B7 classifier, achieving 90.45% accuracy on the ISIC2017 dataset, outperforming both conventional GradCAM (87.78%) and dedicated segmentation architectures, including DeepLabv3 and SAM v2 by more than 5 percentage points in Dice score. The EfficientNet-B7 backbone achieves a micro-average AUC of 0.97 across eight lesion classes, with a melanoma AUC of 0.99. Color quantification uses K-means clustering with a threshold calibrated on the PH2 dataset (MSE = 1.425). Applied to 87 wide-angle images, the mole detection module achieved an F1 score of 86%. The system outputs a structured CSV of per-lesion ABCD scores suitable for clinical triage and longitudinal tracking. A clinical validation study with dermatologists and surgeons is underway to assess concordance between automated and expert assessments.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection and measurement of butterfly eyespot and spot patterns using convolutional neural networks 94%
- Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms 93%
- FalseColor-Python: a rapid intensity-leveling and digital-staining package for fluorescence-based slide-free digital pathology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural frameworks improve the accuracy of general practitioners in the classification of pigmented skin lesions 93%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- DermoExpert: Skin lesion classification using a hybrid convolutional neural network through segmentation, transfer learning, and augmentation 95%
- An Inexpensive Smartphone-Based Device and Predictive Models for Rapid, Non-Invasive, and Point-of-Care Monitoring of Ocular and Cardiovascular Complications Related to Diabetes 92%
- COVID Faster R-CNN: A Novel Framework to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in X-Ray Images 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.