Back

Half-Dose Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Trial With PRU-Guided Pharmacodynamic Assessment

Kuo, F.-Y.; Wang, M. C.; Chiang, C.-H.; Liu, E.-S.; Yang, T.-H.; Tai, H.-T.; Yao, C.-S.; Chang, R.; Mar, G.-Y.

2026-07-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356433 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Aspirin-free P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), but the evidence rests largely on full-dose ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome and on designs retaining a DAPT run-in; East-Asian patients may not require the same antithrombotic intensity. We compared standard DAPT, DAPT with half-dose ticagrelor, and aspirin-free half-dose ticagrelor monotherapy initiated on the day of PCI in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Methods: Sixty-one East-Asian patients with CCS scheduled for elective PCI were randomized 1:1:1 to Control (aspirin plus clopidogrel), Experimental A (aspirin plus ticagrelor 45 mg twice daily), or Experimental B (ticagrelor 45 mg monotherapy, aspirin discontinued at day 2). DAPT arms continued for six months; Experimental B continued indefinitely. P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) were measured at baseline and at a median of 17 days. Results: PRU reduction was three-fold greater in both ticagrelor arms than in Control ({Delta}PRU -188 and -181 versus -60.5; P<0.001), with no difference between ticagrelor arms (P=0.772). At 12 months, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and clinically relevant bleeding each occurred in 1 of 17 Experimental B patients (5.9%) and in neither other arm. One Experimental A patient crossed over for ticagrelor-induced dyspnea; no stent thrombosis or cardiac death occurred. Conclusions: In East-Asian patients with CCS, half-dose ticagrelor produced markedly greater platelet inhibition than standard DAPT, with an identical effect whether given with or without aspirin. It merits evaluation in an adequately powered randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registration. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT07622056

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
16
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
21
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
29
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%