Back

Combinatorial regulation of cellular rotation by CUL-3-actomyosin-dependent oriented division, eggshell geometry, and Ras–MAPK signaling during dorsal–ventral axis establishment in Caenorhabditis elegans

Khor, M.;Lai, C.;Gough, C.;Xiong, Y.;Hiroyasu, A.;Li, T.;Hsu, C.;Juciute, V.;Kim, M.;Dofher, K.;Sugioka, K.

2026-06-29 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.28.735104 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cellular rotation is an understudied mechanism that regulates animal morphogenesis. In C. elegans, the dorsal-ventral axis is established when the two-cell-stage AB cell rotates within the eggshell as it divides, generating the diamond-shaped blastomere arrangement at the four-cell stage that enables distinct cell fate specification. Multiple mechanisms, including actomyosin-dependent oriented division, chiral cortical flow, and eggshell shape, have been proposed to regulate this arrangement, but whether these represent conflicting hypotheses or co-acting mechanisms remains unclear. Here, we show that CUL-3-actomyosin-dependent oriented division, eggshell geometry, and the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway regulate distinct steps of cellular rotation. AB cell rotation occurred in two distinct phases: Phase I during AB cytokinesis and Phase II during cytokinesis of the neighboring P1 cell. Quantitative analysis revealed that CUL-3-actomyosin-dependent oriented division is the only one of these three pathways that regulates the AB division axis before anaphase. Actomyosin-dependent oriented division and eggshell geometry were both required for Phase I rotation, whereas Phase II rotation was independent of eggshell geometry. We further identified the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway as a regulator of AB cell rotation that acts independently of eggshell geometry. Strikingly, the CUL-3-actomyosin-dependent pathway may have two distinct roles: first, specifying the AB division axis, and second, correcting the division axis in all cell types during cytokinesis. Together, these functions contribute significantly to cellular rotation and dorsal-ventral axis establishment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 5%
14.7%
2
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
11.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.6%
5
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.6%
6
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.7%
8
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.2%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
11
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
12
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
14
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
15
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
17
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
19
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
20
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
22
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%