Back

Monitoring microscope performance in an imaging facility using OMERO-metrics.

Sommer, S.; Dhmine, O.; Mateos Langerak, J.; Dobbie, I. M.

2026-07-01 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.28.735071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microscopes are essential tools for discoveries on a scale invisible to the unaided human eye. The development of immuno-fluorescence followed by molecular biology techniques and fluorescent fusion proteins have revolutionised the use of optical microscopy in bioscience. The quality of the data produced is dependent upon the sample, its preparation and the instrument used. However, instruments can degrade over time without easily visible changes to the produced images and, in turn, negatively impacts results. By testing instruments and doing comparisons between results over time and between different instruments, problems can be highlighted and corrective action can be taken. Using small fluorescent beads the point spread function (PSF) of the microscope can be recorded and the image resolution measured. Beads were prepared in a concentration matched to the field of view size and dried onto coverslips and mounted on slides. The beads were then imaged as 3D Z-stacks of sufficient size to fully enclose the PSF of the system. This data was uploaded to OMERO and processed using OMERO-metrics, an OMERO plugin developed for this purpose. This paper summarizes the development of workflows and protocols to enable this process, presents the results obtained and demonstrates the detection of significant instrument issues.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
6
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
16
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
19
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
28
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%